![]() |
http://www.smh.com.au/digital-life/mobiles/iphone-halo- launches-apple-into-stratosphere-20120215-1t546.html Apple's CEO, Tim Cook |
Apple knows who its consumers are: affluent, upper-middle class people, who can afford to drop hundreds of dollars on a phone, and thousands of dollars on a computer. Wealthy people are statistically more likely to keep up with news, and be interested in where the products they use come from. (I learned this in my political science class last year.)
This demonstrates the importance of being familiar with one's audience in rhetorical situations, and being mindful of what the audience may or may not already know about the subject. Underestimating your audience's knowledge can be detrimental. See, if Apple's audience didn't keep up so well on their news, and where their iPhones came from, the company could probably get away with using factories who don't meet fair labor standards. But Apple's consumers do pay attention, so Apple must also. If the company ignores the headlines about inhumane labor practices, they risk losing their shiny image in the media, and possibly even losing customers, who want products made with human rights in mind.
This post brings up a really good point, and being able to connect the Apple consumers with the audience of the news story is quite a significant detail. That being said, though, I feel like Apple has enough fanboys to keep their profits in the green, even if a few people protest their labor practices. I mean, let's face it; most people aren't getting iPhones, iPads, and other iShit to keep up with how reprehensible Apple's business practices may be.
ReplyDelete